Axiomatic of mechanics, nature of time, space, energy, aether. Existence of aether indicated by erroneously so called inertial forces.
- Special theory of relativity- a confused gedankenexperiment
- Axiomatics of mechanics. Nature of inertia. Mass = number of H-atoms
The axiomatic presentation of mechanics is based on indefinable, fundamental notions from which the other notions can be defined. What is meant by undefined basic concepts? We cannot define all concepts in a logical manner (by words) because this would go to infinity. We don’t define some concepts by using other concepts but we introduce […]
- Derivation of „rest mass energy“ E = m0 c12 violates logic of math E = m0 c2 conceptually not intelligible
Pay attention to the fact that the two terms of the resulting difference E = [m0 c2 γ – m0 c2 ] represent the values for the upper or final (here v = v) and lower or initial limit (here = 0) of the integral. It is a question of mathematical logic that the […]
- The Anderson effect occurs in a dielectric aether Indications for the existence of a dielectric medium
Allegedly 2 γ-photons of energy E > 1, 022 MeV can produce an electron-positron pair (= Positronium, Ps). But this occurence of Ps is only possible in the presence of a “catalysator”, namely a molecule. The lattice of the molecule acts obviously as a buffer in order to bounce the positronium. The occurrence of Ps […]
- Conservation of mass is a synthetic a priori judgement (Kant). If mass is not conserved, mass values are false.
There is no mass defect, Einstein misled physics. Kant is right. To identify energy and mass is a category mistake. Abstract Kant reasoned that the principle of mass conservation is a synthetic a priori judgement that we can obtain independently of experience. So it cannot be falsified by experiments. Kant: During all transformations of the […]
- Stellar Hydrogen Fusion Not due to Supernatural Proton-Proton- or CNO Cycle
Stellar Hydrogen Fusion Does Not Work according to Supernatural Proton-Proton- or CNO Cycle Only God could transubstantiate protons into neutrons Helium nuclei are not made up of 2 neutrons and 2 protons Photons and The neutrino is a stopgap of inherently flawed Quantum Mechanics
- Synthesis of elements by helium and oxygen building blocks Bohr atomic model untenable No empirical evidence for electron orbitals Atoms are structured composites of hydrogen atoms Periodicity of periodic table elements due to genesis of element formation
Atomic magnetic moments due to hydrogen constituents of the atom, not due to angular momenta of electron orbital and spin motions. In atomic fusions magnetic moments are conserved High temperature element fusion untenable There is no direct experimental evidence for the existence of electron orbitals. If orbitals are presupposed, atomic fission is not causally explainable. […]
Fictituous neutrons and neutrinos
- -NEUTRONS ARE DECAYING EXCITEDHYDROGEN ATOMS
HYDROGEN ATOMS ARE DESTABILIZED DURING DECOMPOSITION OF THE ATOM • Unstable neutrons are not components of the atoms • All atoms are made up of hydrogen that comprises magnetically coupled proton and electron • The discoverer of the decaying neutron was Robson in 1950 and not Chadwick
- NEUTRINOS DON’T EXIST
THE NEUTRINO IS A STOPGAP FOR INHERENTLY FLAWED QUANTUM MECHANICS Pauli made a category mistake: One cannot equate qualities of particles that possess mass and charge with a pure ghost particle – the neutrino. Spin conservation for neutron decay n => p + e— is impossible, neutrino spin for spn conservation not necessary….
ALL ELEMENTS CONSIST OF HYDROGEN
- Ionization Energies Manifest Natural Harmonies of Elemental Eigen Frequencies
Ionization Energies of the Elements Manifest Natural Harmonies of Elemental Eigen Frequencies Atoms are antennas that emit and absorb electromagnetic waves Elements are specific arrangements of hydrogen atoms (Prout 1819) Extra nuclear electrons of Bohr’s atomic model untenable
- NMR PHENOMENA UNEXPLAINABLE BY QUANTUM THEORY
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE PHENOMENA UNEXPLAINABLE BY QUANTUM THEORY NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR NUCLEAR SPIN Magnetic coupling is the bonding agent of molecules. Molecules possess magnetic resonance frequencies. No empirical evidence for nuclear spins.
- Hydrogen fine structure cannot be the rationale for doublets. No orbiting and spinning electrons
Hydrogen fine structure cannot be the rationale for doublets. Electromagnetism of orbiting and spinning electrons inherently flawed. No evidence for orbiting and spinning electrons.
- Stern-Gerlach vs. Phipps-Taylor
Contradicting results of Stern-Gerlach and Phipps-Taylor experiments prove that spins of the 5s1 silver electron and the 1s1 hydrogen electron cannot be the cause of atomic magnetic moments Empirical verification of a priori identified values of total angular momenta due to orbital and spin motions of electrons missing In atomic fusions magnetic moments are conserved […]
rutherford-bohr-de Broglie model of atom fictituous.
- WHAT IS THE CAUSE FOR THE 6 and 21 Quantum jumps or spin flip are impossible explanationsCM HYDROGEN RADIATION?
Quantum jumps or spin flip are impossible explanations
THE NATURE OF CHEMICAL BONDING
- Molecular bonding
Covalent, ionic and metallic bonding models cannot explain the dynamic stability of molecules There are no valence electrons that operate as bonding agents Bonding is due to magnetic coupling Hydrogen atoms are the connecting links between atomic cores that consist of hydrogen building blocks
electrical conductivity, heat capacity, metallic bonding not due to valence electrons
- The Hall effect revisited
- No conduction electrons – VALENCE ELECTRONS DON’T EXIST AS CARRIERS OF ELECTRIC CURRENT
Metallic bonding is not due to forces between alleged free valence electrons and atomic core ions. Electrons are also neither the agents for electrical and thermal conduction nor for specific heat. Genuine metallic lattices consist of elastic rods and nodes. Rods consist of hydrogen atoms.
THE NATURE OF ELECTRICITY
- THE NATURE OF ELECTRICITY: ELECTRICITY IS THE PROPAGATION OF A POLARIZATION WAVE
NO CONDUCTION ELECTRONS! ELECTRICITY IS THE PROPAGATION OF A POLARIZATION WAVE Johann Marinsek/2014 [email protected] Einstein: … free electrons do not exist in metals at all. Heisenberg:… electrons in metals were one proving ground for quantum mechanics.
- Quark theory questionable
- Electron Orbitals imaginary
Rutherford’s unrealistic interpretation of scattering results whereby atoms consist of nuclei surrounded by electrons in empty space Observations did of electronic orbitals not succeed. If there are no extra nuclear electrons, then the standard atomic model is history. Bonding and conducting electrons, neutrons, neutrinos, the periodic table according to fillings of atomic shells,… then are […]
- Metallic bonding:
Metallic bonding: Electrons don’t provide the glue holding solids together Genuine metallic lattices consist of elastic rods made of hydrogen atoms Metallic bonding is not due to forces between alleged free valence electrons and atomic core ions. There is no natural law that governs the process how and how many valence electrons are detached from […]
- COMPTON EFFECT IS A RAMAN WAVE EFFECT
COMPTON EFFECT IS A RAMAN WAVE EFFECT UNMODIFIED RAYS NOT DUE TO COLLISIONS PHOTONS VS. NUCLEI
- The meaning of h for de Broglie matter waves
Phase velocity u of de Broglie waves exceeds light velocity c: u > c Compton effect no evidence for photons that carry an energy packet E = hν Occurring electrons not from carbon target but released electrons from the dielectric electron-positron aether Both, Bohr + Schrödinger argue with the duality of wave and electron, that’s […]
- Specific heat of metals not due to hypothesized valence electrons
Thermic radiation due to trembling solid rods of the crystal lattice; influence of lattice nodes minor. Free valence electrons don’t exist in metals, therefore they cannot be the carriers of temperature oscillation, they cannot be agents of bonding and electrical conduction. • Heat capacity depends predominantly on crystal structure. • Concerning the crystal structure, heat capacity […]
standard model refuted
- Moseley’s law refuted: Not atomic number Z determines X-ray but atomic mass A
Atoms show periodic incremental patterns Atomic number Z is pointless and can be cancelled Atomic nuclei with Z protons and N neutrons don’t exist From Moseley’s data it is impossible to infer that atoms possess Z extra-nuclear electrons, electrons that are arranged in shells or orbitals. It is also impossible to infer that there are […]
- Bohr-Moseley atomic model refuted
Atoms don’t comprise nuclei and electron shells Nuclei don’t comprise Z protons and (A – Z) neutrons Electron shells don’t exist The compact atom consists of hydrogen atoms Their number is identical with mass number A Nuclear reactions refute the nuclear and electronic shell model: Uranium fission is the most convenient example to show the […]